Rule of 72 Calculator
A quick mental-math trick for estimating how long it takes an investment to double — plus the precise compound-interest answer, side by side, so you can see how good the shortcut actually is.
Your details
Your results
EstimateThis calculator provides estimates for educational and informational purposes only. It does not constitute financial, investment, legal, accounting, or tax advice. Results are based on the assumptions and information entered and may differ materially from actual outcomes. Tax rules and financial regulations can change. Consult an appropriately qualified professional for advice specific to your situation.
The Rule of 72 is a rounding shortcut. Use the precise figures shown alongside it for anything where the exact number matters.
- Instantly estimates doubling time at any growth rate — just divide 72 by the rate.
- Shows the precise compound-interest answer alongside the estimate, so you can see the gap.
- Also covers tripling (Rule of 114) and quadrupling (Rule of 144).
- Works the same way in reverse, to estimate how fast inflation halves purchasing power.
How to use this calculator
Enter a growth rate and, optionally, a starting amount to see the projected dollar values. The calculator returns the Rule of 72 estimate for doubling time, the precise answer from the actual compound-interest formula, and the same comparison for tripling and quadrupling.
Where the Rule of 72 comes from
The precise time to double an amount at a compounding rate r is:
years to double = ln(2) ÷ ln(1 + r)
For small rates, ln(1 + r) is closely approximated by r itself, and ln(2) ≈ 0.693. Multiplying 0.693 by 100 (to work with a percentage rather than a decimal) gives 69.3 — and 72 is used instead purely because it divides evenly by more small numbers (1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 9, 12), making the mental arithmetic easier at the cost of a small amount of accuracy.
A worked example
At a 7% annual return, the Rule of 72 estimates 72 ÷ 7 ≈ 10.3 years to double. The precise compound-interest answer is about 10.24 years — the estimate is off by roughly two months, close enough for most planning purposes at this rate.
How accurate is it, really?
The Rule of 72 is most accurate in roughly the 4%–15% range, where the small-rate approximation behind it holds up well. Below that range or well above it, the gap between the quick estimate and the precise answer widens — still useful for a rough sense of scale, but worth switching to the precise figure (shown side by side here) once the exact number actually matters for a decision.
Other uses for the same trick
The same shortcut works for any multiple, using a different constant: divide by 114 instead of 72 to estimate tripling time, or 144 for quadrupling — both are simply the equivalent of ln(3) and ln(4) scaled the same way ln(2) was scaled to get 72.
It also works in reverse for a very different, less pleasant question: how fast inflation erodes purchasing power. Dividing 72 by an inflation rate estimates the number of years until money buys half as much — at 3% inflation, that's about 24 years; at 6%, about 12.
Common mistakes
Treating it as exact. It's a rounding shortcut built for mental math, not a precise formula — for anything with real money riding on the exact number, use the precise compound-interest calculation instead.
Applying it to a rate that isn't actually a steady compounding rate. The Rule of 72 assumes one consistent rate compounding the whole time — a volatile investment's average return over many years is not the same thing as a steady rate compounding smoothly, even if the arithmetic average looks similar.
Forgetting it works for inflation and fees too, not just growth. The same shortcut applies to anything that erodes value at a steady rate — inflation, and investment fees, both "double" their cumulative effect on the same kind of schedule.
Frequently asked questions
A quick mental-math shortcut for estimating how many years it takes an amount to double at a given compounding growth rate: divide 72 by the rate (as a whole number, so 7 for 7%). It's an approximation of the precise compound-interest formula, accurate to within a percent or two across a wide range of common rates.
Very accurate roughly between 4% and 15%, typically within a few percent of the precise answer. Outside that range, the approximation drifts further from the exact figure — still useful for a rough sense of scale, but the precise formula (shown alongside it here) is worth using once the exact number matters.
The underlying math (ln(2) ≈ 0.693, scaled to 69.3 for percentages) points to a number close to 69 or 70. 72 was chosen instead because it divides evenly by many small numbers — 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 9, 12 — making it much easier to do the division in your head, at a small cost to precision.
Yes — the same idea works with different constants: 114 for roughly tripling, and 144 for roughly quadrupling. Both are the same style of approximation applied to ln(3) and ln(4) instead of ln(2).
Yes, in reverse — dividing 72 by an inflation rate estimates how many years it takes for that inflation to cut purchasing power in half. At 3% inflation, that's about 24 years; at 6%, about 12.
No — it's a pure math shortcut applied to whatever rate you give it. If you want the estimate to reflect a real-world after-tax, after-fee return, use that net rate as the input rather than a fund's gross stated return.